Comments for Undo for Mathematica

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by Dirichlet

Dirichlet — Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:56:45 +0000

For me, the undo command works in version 10.0.3 (more than one time).

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by Marta

Marta — Thu, 08 Oct 2015 08:59:56 +0000

Omg since I am a beginner I thought it was my fault!!! It’s insane! The only “solution” I’ve found is to save a newnotebook every time I’m going to make a big modification. Still….it’s insane! 0.O

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by Luke

Luke — Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:49:34 +0000

I can see how it’s difficult to undo the *execution* of a cell, without saving the entire kernel state. But it’s incredibly easy to have many levels of undo for *edits* to text and input cells. That’s really all we need. I’ve personally implemented an undo/redo stack in my own programs; it’s super easy. I don’t know why Wolfram can’t add that. I don’t think users really need to undo actual execution of a cell, and I don’t think users expect to.

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by Ben Wilson

Ben Wilson — Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:55:53 +0000

Need more levels of undo/ redo!

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by Matt

Matt — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:51:44 +0000

Apparently it is too hard doing it, but surely it must not be too hard as to not have it.

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by you rock

you rock — Thu, 08 May 2014 21:07:56 +0000

you rock for posting dedicating a website for this fundamental problem.

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by Bernardo Sulzbach

Bernardo Sulzbach — Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:48:18 +0000

1. Enter a 200 term matrix term-by-term.
2. Delete it (ops).
3. Type ].
Ctrl+Z brings your “]” back.

“Clap, clap, clap”

Comment on Undo – How Useless? by Guangyue Han

Guangyue Han — Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:57:35 +0000

I cannot believe this! It is the most basic functionality one needs!